Importance Of Validity And Reliability For Qualitative Researchers

Running head : harshness and Reliability for soft ResearchImportance of harshness and Reliability for qualitative ResearchersIntroductionQualitative inquiry is the most popular appearance for procedure in the social plump forers . But soft seekers ar continuously being confronted on the issues of validity and reliability of their query results . This issue among soft searchers has existed for more than five decades now (Atkinson et al , 2003 . In fact , recently , the issue has radically cast up and it is not just an issue in UK , only if globally (Seale , 2001 . This is due in part , to the scientific company query the reliability and validity of qualitative research on which they cartel to eventually discredit qualitative research resultsThe research alliance always calls for scientifically based research whichinvolves the application of squiffy info analysis to ravel the stated hypothesis . get ahead , this scientifically based research must be accurate and replicable to get reliable and valid knowledge . Moreover the research must employ rigorous data analysis to political campaign the stated hypothesis (ESRC , 2002 . While this maybe true in quantitative research , it is not so in qualitative research . Testing hypotheses replicability and accuracy of procedures are not so important issues for qualitative researchers . This is basically due to the fact that qualitative and quantitative researches are two distinct research methodologiesThe Qualitative versus Quantitative Dichotomy in ResearchIn discussing techniques in social acquaintance research , there is often an assumed dichotomy amid qualitative and quantitative research . This cordial of dichotomizing is headable . comparable Robert Frost , in his poem Mending Fences cardinal usher out mind the wisdom of the oft-repeated saying , Good f! ences hold up dangerous neighbors Certainly , in research , and in social learning research in particular , it is to be doubted if indeed original fences make good neighborsHuman beings do like to dichotomize , in all likelihood because so much of biological carriage is in pairs .

Binarity and enough division makes homo sapiens easygoing it enables him to get a handle on things he stern whence make fruitful oppositions . Perhaps the same kind of criticism can be made of the dichotomy and singularity researchers make surrounded by quantitative and qualitative research . But what is necessary and sufficient - whether wiz i s using rime or verbal data and verbal data congregation techniques - is keenness . This beginning timber is a product almost of intuition , or insight - it is not yet see from social philosophers , phenomenologists , and psychologists whether these two are one and the same , but what is obvious is that this insight is qualitative , not quantitative . To attack to answer a question or to verify a hunch , there is because a whole panoply of tools and techniques one needs , some qualitative , some quantitativeHence , whether the supporting designate is qualitative or quantitative the insight , which is qualitative , is domineering . One gathers data quantifies , tabulates , makes absolute frequency counts , find averages , then attempts to make room for geological fault and to give the sack error and discount chance occurrences by tests of significance - sole(prenominal) because in to support a particular stance , one needs to do that . It is never the mindless...If you want to get a full essay, enact it on our websit! e: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay